Personal projects are a great way to grow your skillset, learn new technologies and explore new ideas. I began my personal blog with that in mind, but also wanted to share what I learn. With that in mind, I wanted to try and document the process behind this new redesign.
I began this current redesign almost immediately after finishing my last redesign. My original plan was to launch a default Gatsby starter blog and then incrementally redesign it. That did not go as planned.
Difficulties with Gatsby conventions (like using the GraphQL data mesh layer and MDX weirdness) and a growing concern over build performance led me to eventually abandon the framework. I spent the next year or so trying out different tools and tweaking design decisions, until I landed on what you see here.
As I write this, the design and build out are not complete, but I've decided to launch what I have so far. Why? I have confidence that getting the design out into the real world will help me iterate on it quicker, and I can easily see which ideas have value and which do not. With that said, here are some highlights of the design.
I have always been a fan of the Swiss Style, so I knew I wanted to incorporate a strong grid with a grotesque typeface. The grid on the blog pages is based on the Golden Ratio, with the main block on wide displays being roughly 0.618 times the width of the full grid. The text blocks are limited in line length using
ch units, which equal the width of a font's
Breaking with the Swiss Style, and as an homage to the cartoons that inspired this blog's name, I wanted to include hand-drawn illustrations and decoration, just so the site itself didn't end up feeling too cold or rigid.
My process has been sketching out ideas on paper first, then moving into Figma or Affinity Designer for high fidelity exploration. I've tried to move to designing in the browser as quickly as possible because that's the medium the design will ultimately end up in. If I run into a design roadblock in the browser, I return to Figma or Affinity Designer and explore some more.
I love geometric typefaces, but they tend to be cold. Since I have hand-drawn elements, I wanted something with a bit more warmth. Rotunda filled the role perfectly, with a mix of geometric and humanistic forms. Oh, and I'm a sucker for double-story 'g's and 'a's.
I'm using Rotunda almost exclusively for headings, and for the body copy I'm opting for a simple system font stack. I'm still weighing the cost/benefit of using Rotunda for body copy as well. I'm trying to be somewhat conservative with the page weight.
One element of this design I really like, heavily inspired by CSS-Tricks, is the animated gradient link hover style. The effect is achieved using an oversized background gradient clipped to the text with
background-clip: text. The only thing that's animated is the
box-decoration-break magic that makes sure the background style translates properly across line breaks, and
-webkit-text-fill-color: transparent is needed to hide the text color.
The new design is completely static and built with Eleventy. I've chosen Eleventy to replace my previous framework of Gatsby mainly because of Eleventy's flexibility and ease of use. Eleventy is also a great deal faster than Gatsby, though my site is so small that I've barely noticed a difference when building.
Update: Yeah, so, I'm not using Liquid anymore. The biggest reason is a practical one: the syntax highlighting and language support has been a constant pain to manage in VS Code. I've been using the Liquid VS Code extension, which I've had to completely disable due to an incident where it fried some source code at work (long story short, there's a bug that causes it to encode certain tokens that unknowingly rewrote a large portion of some JSP templates). Even before that, it wasn't that great of an extension. The author is supposedly rewriting it into a freemium extension called Liquify, but I'm not terribly interested.
To be honest, using Liquid at this point feels like swimming upstream. I've switched to Nunjucks, and already I feel less tension with my editor. I was able to convert everything over in an hour or so. I won't tell you how long it took me to convert over to Liquid.
CSS has been going through a layout renaissance over the past few years, and I have been keen to explore some Intrinsic Web Design techniques. In particular, I wanted to avoid screen width media queries as much as possible. And as I'm working toward that goal, I've been using this site to get better acquainted with CSS Grid.
I'm also using some fluid typography, as well as the shiny new
clamp function. I should note that fluid typography utilizes viewport units, which breaks custom default values for users. For that reason, I've limited the fluid typography to the page title and site spacing.
Of course, this wouldn't be modern CSS without a good dose of custom properties. I'm trying to use property names that are more representational of their use and not their description (e.g.
--color-main instead of
--color-black). This should make it easier for theming in the future for things like a "dark mode."
Finally, I'm following the ITCSS way of organization for all of my styles. If given the choice, it's my preferred methodology. I think the concept of going from wide usage and weak specificity toward very specific, focused styles best represents my mental model of CSS.
First of all, Dart Sass has the latest and greatest Sass goodies, like Sass modules, which offer a superior experience for limiting the scope of modules and optimizing imports. I personally like the explicitness of creating namespaces so you know what file that magical mixin came from.
This slow development cycle means LibSass can't even keep up with the CSS spec. If you attempt to use the
min functions as they are supported in CSS, you will receive an error due to Sass's history with these functions. There are workarounds for this and other issues, but I prefer not to bother with them.
Finally, in order to get my site to you, I'm using Netlify. There's nothing really special about my deployment configuration; it's basically the configuration file that Eleventy generates. The only difference is I'm generating the Sass at build time as well.
Something to note: when I first deployed the new site, I kept getting a build error. It looked like there was a process that wasn't ending properly. Turns out my the
clean script I had added to the
build was the culprit. I've patched up the issue by creating a separate build step for production only.
I think eventually I would like to write a custom build script, one that relies on environment variables to do things like watch for changes or clean build files. This is something I've been trying to work towards in my work on The Container Store website's front end tooling, and this would be a great place to try some different ideas out.
One reason people tend to pick static site generators is performance, so how does my site perform? It depends on what day you're auditing the site. I'm still tweaking some of my Lighthouse scores, but performance is coming out to a score of 100. Honestly, my Gatsby site had the same score (again, this is not a big site at the moment, and it's mostly text).
Some things I need to work on are SEO and some annoying duplicate ID issues that are dinging me on my Accessibility score. Ultimately, the goal is to get to 100 in all categories, and hopefully I'll get there by the time people are reading this post.
Update: The last few issues have been corrected and now I'm getting all 100s!
So, I am by no means done with the site. My future plans are to add a contact form that utilizes Netlify forms, add an About page with some more detail about me, and add a bookshelf section that shows what I've been reading. In terms of features, I'd like to integrate my Twitter feed into the home page to show my latest TIL (today I learned) tweet, add site-wide messaging, finish the home page layout, and possibly switch from Liquid templates to Vue via Eleventy's experimental Vue support.
I also want to incorporate more design elements I just haven't been able to get to, like adding animations and more hand-drawn visuals. I want to be considerate of site performance as well, so I'm cautiously experimenting with different approaches.
So that's a short overview of my blog's redesign. I promise there's more to come, but my ultimate goal is to push past my tendency for perfectionism. You can't share what you're doing if you wait for perfection. I hope this has been helpful in some way to you.
Are you in the middle of designing and/or building your own personal project? I want to hear from you. Do you have any questions about my process or the stack I'm using? I want to hear from you, too.
Until next time!